The project is in its relatively final phase and the mGov4EU Executive Board meeting in Tartu marked the beginning of the last six months of the project. On 20th June, all partners met in Tartu to report on the project’s progress since the last meeting in Barcelona and to discuss the next steps. Besides the status update of the individual work packages, the first part of a Technical Integration Workshop was also conducted. The first day of the meeting was rounded off with a dinner afterwards, where the partners could also experience the famous “White Nights” due to the summer solstice in Estonia. The second day continued with the meeting where administrative things were decided, such as our next meeting in Stuttgart and more workshops on our book and on sustainability and co-creation took place. At the same time, the i-Voting pilot was tested by SCY and UTARTU. After the meeting, our partners DUK, Fraunhofer and UTARTU stayed together to prepare for the participation in dg.o 2023, from which you will also hear something soon.
A joint Executive Board & General Assembly Meeting of the mGov4EU consortium took place at the Danube University Krems from 31st May-1st June 2022. During this hybrid meeting the partners met for two efficient days face-to-face and remote. The main focus of the meeting was on the technical and scientific project progress. Two workshops on “Sustainability & Governance” and “Transdisciplinary pilot evaluation” were organized and many essential discussions on the further progress of the project took place. The project partner Scytl has also started the pilot projects in WP4. The first day of the meeting was rounded off with a social event and at the end of the second day the three partners DUK, UTARTU and Fraunhofer met for a post-workshop meeting on sustainability and evaluation to recap the consortium meeting and to discuss the next steps. The next 18 months of the project will in fact focus on the implementation phase of the various building blocks and their validation on the basis of three project pilots. Watch the video to get some impressions from the meeting:
The central objective of the mGov4EU project is to facilitate the use of inclusive mobile Government services in Europe. In order to do so, solutions are being created that allow citizens to take control over their personal data, by managing it on their own trusted mobile devices. They can choose to keep or delete their personal information, to keep it to themselves or to share it, and to make it accessible to public administrations when they want to.
On the surface, mGov4EU may seem to be a legal compliance dream, since it ticks all the right boxes. Citizens manage their own personal data safely and transparently, precisely as European data protection law – notably the well known GDPR – would have it. They have reliable tools to identify themselves and to sign documents in a trustworthy manner, as envisaged by the eIDAS Regulation that covers these topics. And document exchanges with public administrations are enabled only at the citizen’s individual request, in accordance with the European rules on once-only data exchanges in the Single Digital Gateway Regulation (SDGR). What’s not to love?
And yet, mGov4EU has some challenging legal knots to untie as well. Principally, these relate to the paradigm shift that’s introduced by putting information squarely in the hands of the citizens. In traditional e-government transactions, information remains firmly under the control of public administrations. Citizens may be able to get extracts, certificates, attestations and so forth for the purposes of specific procedures; but at the root of traditional e-government, public administrations act as data controllers, and as stewards of their citizens’ data. While this approach is perhaps slightly (and certainly unintentionally) patronising, it does have the benefit of ensuring that citizen data is in the hands of an organisation that should, in principle, be able to protect it – at least better than most citizens can.
Even the much more innovative information exchanges envisaged by the SDGR don’t fundamentally challenge that logic. The SDGR requires data to be exchanged directly between public administrations in certain e-government services, at the citizen’s request. The citizen is to some extent in control, in the sense that he must request the exchange before it can happen, and can even validate the information to be exchanged before it is sent. But the information fundamentally passes from one governmental body to another – an exchange from one controller to the next, with the citizen acting as a gatekeeper, but not as the holder of their own data.
And this is precisely where mGov4EU creates new possibilities, but also new challenges. The standard SDGR data flow doesn’t involve mobile devices, let alone data being held permanently by a citizen. Allowing citizens to keep their own data on their own device creates a lot of new options, but also raises a lot of new questions. Who determines which information will be stored on a phone? How can we be sure that the data is safely protected against theft while on the phone? Should all smartphones be supported? Should we validate the identity and competences of aspiring recipients of data? And how do we secure the exchanges between the different stakeholders?
All of these are critical questions to be examined in the course of mGov4EU. The answers will bring innovations and advances compared to the status quo. In order to execute the project in accordance with the EU’s high standards for data protection – including the principles of data protection by design and by default, as required by the GDPR – mGov4EU will have to ensure that sufficient protection capabilities are built into the application itself, and into the information exchanges enabled by the project. A naïve assumption that simply requires citizens to exercise their own diligence, and places all responsibility and risk squarely on their shoulders, would certainly be inadequate.
mGov4EU does not stand alone in examining this shift, however. After the project initiated, a new legislative proposal was published, this time aiming to amend the eIDAS Regulation. One of the innovations included a legal framework for a mobile identity wallet, allowing citizens to securely store and manage their data. If that sounds familiar, then that’s principally because the winds are blowing in a common direction: towards a digital and mobile environment that places greater data stewardship with the citizens themselves. Clearly, mGov4EU has a bright future ahead of itself!